UoPeople Online Syllabus Repository (OSR)
Here you will find the syllabi and primary textbooks for all UoPeople courses. The Disclaimer for Use of the Repository can be found here.
Master of Education in Advanced Teaching (M.Ed.)
EDUC 5440 Assessment and Evaluation
EDUC 5440: Assessment and Evaluation
Credits: 3
Prerequisites:
Recommended:
Course Description: This course will consider formal and informal classroom assessments and their use for guiding curricular decisions, differentiating instruction, fostering student achievement, and improving teacher performance.
The nature and purpose of classroom, diagnostic, placement, problem-solving, formative and summative assessments will be discussed. Test construction and teacher-made tests that are authentic and non-discriminatory are addressed, along with
the importance of fair, consistent and transparent grading practices; developing and using rubrics and checklists; and providing useful student feedback. Implications of on-screen testing and the use of e-assessments for tapping higher order
thinking will be discussed
Required Textbook and Materials: UoPeople courses use open educational resources (OER) and other materials specifically donated to the University with free permissions for educational use. Therefore, students are not required to purchase any textbooks or sign up for any websites that have a cost associated with them. The main required textbooks for this course are listed below, and can be readily accessed using the provided links. There may be additional required/recommended readings, supplemental materials, or other resources and websites necessary for lessons; these will be provided for you in the course's General Information and Forums area, and throughout the term via the weekly course Unit areas and the Learning Guides.
- This course does not contain a main textbook; resources to all required reading will be provided in the course Learning Guide for each week.
Software Requirements/Installation: No special requirements.
Learning Objectives and Outcomes:
By the end of this course students will be able to:
- Analyze the difference between assessment and evaluation
- Analyze the purpose and use of national(NAEP)and international (PISA, TIMSS) assessments
- Analyze the nature and purpose of different types of classroom assessments
- Analyze the role of assessment in guiding curricular decisions, fostering student achievement and differentiating instruction
- Analyze the purpose and use of rubrics as a tool for assessment and evaluation
Course Schedule and Topics: This course will cover the following topics in eight learning sessions, with one Unit per week.
Week 1: Unit 1 - Difference between Assessment and Evaluation in Learning
Week 2: Unit 2 - Different Types of Classroom Assessments
Week 3: Unit 3 - The Use and Purpose of Rubrics and Authentic Assessments
Week 4: Unit 4 - The Role of Assessment in Guiding Decisions
Week 5: Unit 5 - Designing Assessments
Week 6: Unit 6 - Online International Assessments and Online Formative Assessments
Week 7: Unit 7 - The Role of Assessment in Improving Teacher Performance
Week 8: Unit 8 - Fair, Non-Discriminatory Classroom Assessments
Learning Guide: The following is an outline of how this course will be conducted, with suggested best practices for students. The Learning Guides for all units open on the first day of class. Please review all Learning Guides to access the readings, review assignments, etc.
Unit 1: Difference between Assessment and Evaluation in Learning
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Complete and submit the Written Assignment
- Complete the Reflective Portfolio Assignment
Unit 2: Different Types of Classroom Assessments
- Peer assess Unit 1 Written Assignment
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Complete and submit the Written Assignment
- Complete the Reflective Portfolio Assignment
Unit 3: The Use and Purpose of Rubrics and Authentic Assessments
- Peer assess Unit 2 Written Assignment
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Complete and submit the Written Assignment
- Begin and participate in the Group Activity (Due Unit 7)
Unit 4: The Role of Assessment in Guiding Decisions
- Peer assess Unit 3 Written Assignment
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Complete and submit the Written Assignment
- Continue to participate in the Group Activity
Unit 5: Designing Assessments
- Peer assess Unit 4 Written Assignment
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Continue to participate in the Group Activity
- Complete the Reflective Portfolio Assignment
Unit 6: Online International Assessments and Online Formative Assessments
- Peer assess Unit 5 Written Assignment
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Complete and submit the Written Assignment
- Continue to participate in the Group Activity
- Complete the Reflective Portfolio Assignment
Unit 7: The Role of Assessment in Improving Teacher Performance
- Peer assess Unit 6 Written Assignment
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Complete and submit the Written Assignment
- Complete the Group Activity
Unit 8: Fair, Non-Discriminatory Classroom Assessments
- Peer assess Unit 7 Written Assignment
- Read the Learning Guide and Reading Assignments
- Participate in the Discussion Assignment (post, comment, and rate in the Discussion Forum)
- Complete the Reflective Portfolio Assignment
- Complete and submit the anonymous Course Evaluation
Course Requirements:
Discussion Assignments & Response Posts/Ratings
Some units in this course require that you complete a Discussion Assignment. You are
required to develop and post a substantive response to the Discussion Assignment in the Discussion Forum. A substantive response is one that fully answers the question that has been posed by the instructor. In addition, you must extend the discussion
by responding to at least three (3) of your peers’ postings in the Discussion Forum and by rating their posts. Instructions for proper posting and rating (out of a 10 point scale) are provided inside the Discussion Forum for each week. Discussion
Forums are only active for each current and relevant learning week, so it is not possible to contribute to the forum once the learning week has come to an end. Failure to participate in the Discussion Assignment by posting in the Discussion Forum
and responding to peers as required may result in failure of the course.
Written Assignments & Assessment Forms
Most units in this course require that you complete a Written Assignment, which may come in many
forms (case study, research paper, etc.). You are required to submit your assignments by the indicated deadlines and, in addition, to peer assess three (3) of your classmates’ assignments according to the instructions found in the Assessment Form,
which is provided to you during the following week. During this peer assessment period, you are expected to provide details in the feedback section of the Assessment Form, indicating why you awarded the grade that you did to your peer. Please note
that each assignment grade is comprised of a combination of your submission (90%) and your peer assessments (10%). Failure to submit Written Assignments and/or Assessment Forms may result in failure of the course.
Group Activities
During this course, you will be required to complete work as part of a small group. Group work is an important component
of your coursework, as it allows you to deepen relationships with classmates, and gain a more thorough understanding of the topics presented in this course. Further, group work mimics the business environment in which projects are often conducted
in small teams across different departments. You will be randomly assigned to your groups and are expected to work with your teammates throughout the term for all group activities.
Reflective Portfolio Activities
Portfolio Activities are tools for self-reflection and evaluation within the context of the course. These
activities are designed as a means to document and critically reflect upon your learning process. Activities you develop for this course will be kept in your Research and Practice Portfolio and will be important as you progress towards the final courses
in your program, particularly the Advanced Practice and Capstone courses. Ideally, you will draw from your coursework and experiences, as well as what you’ve learned in other courses, and your own current teaching practice to showcase your overall
growth and examine ways in which you can continue to develop and sharpen your research interests and expand your cadre of instructional methods.
Research and Practice Portfolio
Throughout the M.Ed. Program, you will be building a portfolio of instructional strategies and materials, and acquiring knowledge and skills for advanced professional
practice. Students begin building their portfolio right from start. It serves as a repository for research findings and sample units and lessons. Students use it to archive ideas and resources related to instructional methods, classroom
management, and assessment. The portfolio supports your own self-reflection on changes that demonstrate growth in professional knowledge, skills, and attitudes that is part of the Capstone experience. The component
parts of the Research and Practice Portfolio include:
- Reflective Portfolio Activities
- Research
- Teaching and Learning Resources
Course Forum
The Course Forum is the place to raise issues and questions relating to the course. It is regularly monitored by the instructors and is a good place to meet fellow students taking
the same course. While it is not required to participate in the Course Forum, it is highly recommended.
Course Policies:
Grading Components and Weights
Each graded component of the course will contribute some percentage to the final grading scale, as indicated
here:
Discussion Assignments | 20% |
Written Assignments | 30% |
Group Activity | 25% |
Reflective Portfolio Activities | 25% |
TOTAL | 100% |
Grading Scale
This course will follow the standard 100-point grading scale defined by the University of the People, as indicated here:
Letter Grade |
Grade Scale | Grade Points |
A+ | 98-100 | 4.00 |
A | 93-97 | 4.00 |
A- | 90-92 | 3.67 |
B+ | 88-89 | 3.33 |
B | 83-87 | 3.00 |
B- | 80-82 | 2.67 |
C+ | 78-79 | 2.33 |
C | 73-77 | 2.00 |
C- | 70-72 | 0.00 |
D+ | 68-69 | 0.00 |
D | 63-67 | 0.00 |
D- | 60-62 | 0.00 |
F | Under 60 | 0.00 |
CR | N/A | N/A |
NC | N/A | N/A |
NF | N/A | N/A |
W | N/A | N/A |
Grade Appeal
If you believe that the final grade you received for a course is erroneous, unjust, or unfair, please contact your course instructor. This must be done within seven days of the
posted final grade. For more information on this topic, please review the Grade Appeal Procedure in the University Catalog.
Participation
Non-participation is characterized by lack of any assignment submissions, inadequate contributions to the Discussion Forums, and/or lack of peer feedback to Discussion/Written Assignments.
Also, please note the following important points about course participation:
- Assignments must be submitted on or before the specified deadline. A course timeline is provided in the course schedule, and the instructor will specify deadlines for each assignment.
- Any student showing non-participation for two weeks (consecutive or non-consecutive) is likely to automatically fail the course.
- Occasionally there may be a legitimate reason for submitting an assignment late. Most of the time, late assignments will not be accepted and there will be no make-up assignments.
- All students are obligated to inform their instructor in advance of any known absences which may result in their non-participation.
Academic Honesty and Integrity
When you submit any work that requires research and writing, it is essential to cite and reference all source material. Failure to properly acknowledge your sources
is known as “plagiarism” – which is effectively passing off an individual’s words or ideas as your own. University of the People adheres to a strict policy of academic honesty and integrity. Failure to comply with these guidelines may result in sanctions
by the University, including dismissal from the University or course failure. For more information on this topic, please review the Academic Integrity Policy in the University Catalog.
Any materials cited in this course should be referenced using the style guidelines established by the American Psychological Association (APA). The APA format is widely used in colleges and universities across the world and is one of several styles and citation formats required for publication in professional and academic journals. Purdue University’s Online Writing Lab (OWL) is a free website that provides excellent information and resources for understanding and using the APA format and style. The OWL website can be accessed here:
Purdue writing lab - resources. (n.d.). Purdue University. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
Code of Conduct
University of the People expects that students conduct themselves in a respectful, collaborative, and honest manner at all times. Harassment, threatening behavior, or deliberate
embarrassment of others will not be permitted. Any conduct that interferes with the quality of the educational experience is not allowed and may result in disciplinary action, such as course failure, probation, suspension, or dismissal. For more information
on this topic, please review the Code of Conduct Policy in the University Catalog.